here one in Soddy for $500 1962

Smelly_Cat · « **on:** October 09, 2008, 10:40:25 PM »

Smelly_Cat · « **Reply #1 on:** October 09, 2008, 10:44:13 PM »

pic 2

IntrstlarOvrdrve · « **Reply #2 on:** October 10, 2008, 12:53:01 AM »

That's a '65 (or a '66 with smoothies)

Smelly_Cat · « **Reply #3 on:** October 10, 2008, 06:19:23 AM »

opps yer correct
http://chattanooga.craigslist.org/cto/856735713.html
1965

Whats is a smoothie?

Ret.Bugtech · « **Reply #4 on:** October 10, 2008, 07:56:54 AM »

Quote from: "Smelly_Cat"

opps yer correct
http://chattanooga.craigslist.org/cto/856735713.html
1965

Whats is a smoothie?

The Rims do not have slots on the disc. The '66-67 Bug has slots . '68 up were all 4 lug W/slots like Stupie has.

Zen · « **Reply #5 on:** October 10, 2008, 09:09:50 AM »

The horn ring doesn't appear be broken off, looks like it was made without one . . . 64 and early 65's didn't have a horn ring. Earlier and later did.

Bugnut · « **Reply #6 on:** October 10, 2008, 09:17:48 AM »

looks like a sea blue 65?

Smelly_Cat · « **Reply #7 on:** October 10, 2008, 09:30:08 AM »

Here be the POWER plant.

So you can tell from them bent up old rusty rims that it is smoothie.

Is a that for those big round moon ball hubcaps? SC

jrcnova · « **Reply #8 on:** October 10, 2008, 09:42:42 AM »

I actually went and looked at this one. The owner told me it was a '65. He also had a '64 as well. The '64 was in much better shape but the engine was laying in the back seat in pieces. The blue one has a mixture of smooth and slotted wheels. I believe the '64 had all smooth wheels. Both seemed to be restorable but with much work to be done. I looked at them in the dark.

jrcnova · « **Reply #9 on:** October 10, 2008, 09:55:13 AM »

I actually went and looked at this one. The owner told me it was a '65. He also had a '64 as well. The '64 was in much better shape but the engine was laying in the back seat in pieces. The blue one has a mixture of smooth and slotted wheels. I believe the '64 had all smooth wheels. Both seemed to be restorable but with much work to be done. I looked at them in the dark.

Ret.Bugtech · « **Reply #10 on:** October 10, 2008, 10:10:33 AM »

The engine would be the easy part. Tetus shot anyone ? :lol:

SC, You are correct Sir.

Bugnut · « **Reply #11 on:** October 10, 2008, 12:02:07 PM »

Wouldn't mind have that late 40hp for parts the car not so much. :lol:

jrcnova · « **Reply #12 on:** October 10, 2008, 09:53:02 PM »

When I went to look at them, he told me I could have them both for $600. I really want the body off of the '65 (one not pictured) to put on my '72 pan (if that will work) if the body is in no worse shape than my current one.

Zen · « **Reply #13 on:** October 11, 2008, 01:26:51 AM »

Floor pans, heater channels and windshield, rebuild the 40 horse, go through the brakes and it would be a pretty sweet driver! If you can do your own welding and wrenching, it wouldn't really cost all that much . . . well, if you don't count your labor, it wouldn't cost that much.

Forums

Topic: here one in Soddy for $500 1962 (Read 3618 times)

Smelly_Cat

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

Smelly_Cat

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

IntrstlarOvrdrve

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

Smelly_Cat

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

Ret.Bugtech

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

Zen

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

Bugnut

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

Smelly_Cat

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

jrcnova

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

jrcnova

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

Ret.Bugtech

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

Bugnut

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

jrcnova

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

Zen

here one in Soddy for $500 1962

About Us

Follow Us

Contact Us