Forums

Topic: Ranger PU  (Read 2779 times)

Offline Ret.Bugtech

Ranger PU

« on: August 15, 2013, 05:38:24 PM »
Has anyone have any comments on Ford Ranger V-6/automatic, good truck,bad truck (1999-2000) ? 45,000 K

Offline xdavid

  • Club Member
  • N. GEORGIA
  • Joined: Aug 2009
  • Posts: 56

Re: Ranger PU

« Reply #1 on: August 19, 2013, 09:10:42 AM »
I have only hear good things not a great truck but dependable and "cheap to keep"

Offline volksnick

  • Secretary
  • Club Member
  • Chattanooga
  • Joined: Apr 2009
  • Posts: 4304

Re: Ranger PU

« Reply #2 on: August 19, 2013, 09:15:45 AM »
Chuck Pack had one that I know gave him trouble with some sensors after an engine swap (I think, don't hold me to that). It kept throwing codes and couldn't be figured out.

I have thought about one previously. They seem pretty simple and straight forward. I don't think they have changed much in 20 years, so that should make it easier to find parts/someone to work on it.

I don't know about the autos, but I seem to lean more towards manuals just for long term dependability.

Offline Anthony

  • In front of the computer
  • Joined: Dec 2001
  • Posts: 1136

Re: Ranger PU

« Reply #3 on: August 22, 2013, 12:35:47 PM »
Thanks for asking. I sold a bunch of these at M Mize in the 90s and had two as demo vehicles.

First, there is a 3.0 AND a 4.0 V6. They're both underpowered, but at least they're not at all fuel-efficient. Mileage in the teens in both cases. Low teens with the 4.0.

Everything feels as if its made of rubber balls, particularly the suspension and shifter linkage. An S-10 of the same vintage has a much more car-like ride. Rangers ride stiffly and the back end would much rather be in front, as it will demonstrate any time you break the tires loose on a wet street (not applicable to the 4-banger).

On the other hand, the interior of the Ranger holds up much better than anything from GM or Dodge. Functional and pretty well laid out. Durable seat material.

I always kept an eye on what was coming into the shop, because that was where the coffee machine was. We rarely saw Rangers or Escorts, Maybe they couldn't make it past all the Contours and Expeditions. I helped sell the first Expedition that came to Mize for over 50 grand. It books for about 10% of that now. Hope they enjoyed it, at least. But I digress...

My 3.0 V6 had the automatic. Much better than rowing the long-throw, rubbery 5-speed, so that would be a plus.

Offline Smelly_Cat

Re: Ranger PU

« Reply #4 on: August 23, 2013, 07:39:32 PM »
I had a sweet deal on one of these V6'es, but I passed.  mostly because the guy lugged around wrong gear alot and I had to listen to the rod bearings cry and I hate that

Here is a post of top 10 reasons not to buy one

10.Paint Quality: Within about 3 months the paint on my truck began to chip. This is hard to believe, I've heard of paint chipping on old vehicles but not new ones. This was not due to off roading or living out on a dirt road either.

9.Gas Mileage: I had a V6 and consistently got about 16-18 mpg doing mostly highway driving. I wasn't doing "jack rabbit starts" or driving over the posted speed limits either. Granted the term fuel economy and truck do not usually go hand in hand. However a full size Chevy with a V6 gets about 25 mpg doing the same sort of driving. To me there is no reason why a "compact" truck should not be able to get the same.

8.Rattles: After about 15,000 miles I started to notice rattling throughout the dash and inner cabin. Again this is something that one would think you would not start to hear until many years of use, if at all.

7.Recalls: Ford had 3 recalls on this truck. The first for the windshield wiper relay that if not corrected to could fail and short out the entire electrical system. The second for the Bridgestone tires that could blow out. And the third for the cruise control system, the system could malfunction causing the throttle cable to stick, i.e. you can't turn off the cruise control, or slow down the truck and you could crash.

6.Poor Craftsmanship: After having the truck for about 10 months, I started to notice this loud noise when I drove over 55 mph on the highway, the truck also started to shake. It was discovered at the dealership that a large bolt in the driveshaft assembly had snapped! Fixed under warranty, but it makes you feel real safe when you know bolts are breaking on the truck.

5.Outdated Styling: Ford has a habit of keeping the same style for far longer than some other car manufactures. They may change a few things here and there but overall the style remains the same. My Ranger was no exception to this.

4.Tire Quality: Long before the whole Bridgestone fiasco, faulty valve stems caused me to get a flat going only 40mph. Another example of how Ford contracts out to the lowest bidder, you get what you pay for.

3.Ugly: They say beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Looking back on this truck, I think it was ugly.

2.Resale Value: All vehicles depreciate, however some drop like a sack of potatoes while others fall like a bag full of feathers. Within 1.5 years, my Ranger had lost half its resale value.

1.Reliability: All of the previous 9 reasons lead to the top reason, reliability. With all the issues I had encountered over just the first 1.5 years, there was little doubt in my mind at least that this truck would not last and be a reliable vehicle over the long haul.

And there you have it, the top 10 reasons why you should not buy a Ford Ranger Pick Up Truck. It's hard to resist these trucks when Ford runs specials such as 0% financing or very large cash rebates. But as the saying goes, you get what you pay for. If you're looking for a truck for the long haul, I suggest you go with a Toyota, Honda, or Nissan.

Offline Ret.Bugtech

Re: Ranger PU

« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2013, 12:11:40 PM »
Well Guys,  I get this feeling that a Ranger is not the way to go but I need a small PU. I know that the Big-3 Jap trucks are the way to go only these "so call compact" trucks are as big as my 250 Dodge. There lies the problem. I cannot stuff the thing in a parking spot anymore . The Mazda I collected while dealing with KC does not have power steering . Its tough to drive do to my crapped out body. Back to the drawing board.
    Thanks for the input .

Offline Smelly_Cat

Re: Ranger PU

« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2013, 03:26:59 PM »
http://chattanooga.craigslist.org/cto/4016336622.html

buy this, Maxda truck  slow as a beetle,  last for ever

There was an error while liking
Liking...

About Us

Chattanooga's oldest and largest club for air-cooled and water-cooled Volkswagens, since 1998. Join Us

Follow Us

© 1998-2025 Scenic City Volks Folks